XHTML is a crock. The W3C is irrelevant.
Needless to say Mark is upset about XHTML 2.0. Of course he shouldn't complain too loudly lest he get drafted as a technical expert by the committee.
What I find most puzzling is the lack of movement on XForms. As of now it looks like the only place it will make an appearance is in XHTML 2.0. I would really like to see an XHTML+SVG+MathML+XForms profile.
[ 2003-01-13 ]
This is a test
Posted by j on 2007-01-12
Posted by joe on 2007-01-12
Posted by ☤ Resolvers on 2007-01-12
☤ Resolvers
Posted by ☤ Resolvers on 2007-01-12
Red
☤ ResolversPosted by ☤ Resolvers on 2007-01-12
Posted by ☤ Resolvers on 2007-01-12
I'm over here.
Posted by joe on 2007-01-12
Posted by fred on 2007-01-12
fred
Posted by joe on 2007-01-12
Posted by joe on 2007-01-12
Posted by j on 2007-01-12
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Italics
int f(x) {
return 2*x;
}
Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
This is fixed. i.e. not broken.Posted by joe on 2007-01-13
Posted by joe on ie on 2007-01-14
Sorry, comments on this entry are closed. Thanks for participating.
Posted by joe on 2007-01-12